January February 97

Bird Dog & Retriever News

Back Issue

State News





MIDWEST STATES

Illinois

REMINGTON CELEBRITY HUNT TO BENEFIT ILLINOIS CONSERVATION PROGRAMS

The first annual Remington International Goose Calling Invitational and Celebrity Hunt will be held Jan. 3-5, and will bring the world's finest goosecallers, sports and entertainment figures to Marion for a special weekend of hunting and goose calling competition. Proceeds from the event will benefit the Illinois Conservation Foundation.

"The Remington International is a major fund-raiser for conservation and wildlife programs in Illinois," said Department of Natural Resources Director Brent Manning. "Fifty lucky hunters will join celebrities from all walks of life to enjoy some of the finest goose hunting in Southern Illinois. I urge hunters, individual donors and corporate sponsors to register early for this memorable event."

The inaugural hunt is reserved for individuals who make a $1,000 tax-deductible contribution to the Illinois Conservation Foundation to support youth hunting and fishing events, National Hunting and Fishing Days and other conservation programs in Southern Illinois. Hunters will be teamed with a top guide, a championship goose caller, and a celebrity to hunt in some of the finest goose pits in the Mississippi Flyway. The weekend package includes a reception and dinner, lodging, meals and goose-pit fees. In addition to its financial support, Remington is providing steel shot to all event participants.

Another major event attraction is the Remington International Goose Calling Championship. According to DNR Public Events Coordinator Ron Allen, the contest is open to the public and will be held at the Marion Cultural Civic Center Saturday evening, Jan. 4.

"We have assembled the finest goose callers in the world to compete for a $20,000 championship purse," Allen said.

Non-hunting donors contributing $500 to the Conservation Foundation will be recognized at a banquet at the Marion Holiday Inn Holidome on Friday Jan. 3, and receive special seating at the Remington International Goose Calling Competition.

For a $3,000 contribution, corporate sponsors will receive all the hunter benefits including goose hunts on Saturday and Sunday mornings for individual employees, a full-page advertisement in the commemorative program, product promotion and special recognition throughout the event.

"As America's oldest gunmaker, we are pleased to join the Illinois Department of Natural Resources to create this unique event to benefit the Illinois Conservation Foundation," said Bill Wohl, senior manager for media relations and public affairs with the Remington Arms Company.

"Illinois is Remington country. We are very active in firearm safety training, hunter education and waterfowl conservation programs in Illinois. The Remington International is a culmination of these activities," Wohl said.

To register for the Remington International Goose Calling Invitational and Celebrity Hunt, as a hunter, donor, or corporate sponsor, or to obtain additional information, call 1-800-GEESE-99, or contact Ron Allen with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources 217-785-9371.

The Illinois Conservation Foundation's mission is to enhance, through external funding, the goals and programs of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. The foundation is an IRS, 501(c) (3) not-for-profit corporation. The amount of the contribution that is deductible as a charitable contribution is limited to the excess of the amount contributed over the value of goods or services furnished in return by the organization.

IOWA

Listing Service Aids Farmers, Hunters

A pilot program matching farmers and hunters looking for places to hunt is being tested in six southern Iowa counties this fall, according to DNR wildlife chief Richard Bishop. Farmers who wish to be involved in the program can have their name placed on a list by contacting their county farm bureau office. Hunters can then call the bureau to request the name of a participating farmer.

"The listing service is a win-win program for both farmers and hunters," said Rick Robinson, director of environmental affairs for the Iowa Farm Bureau. "Many farmers have reported increased crop losses in recent years as habitat increases and wildlife populations multiply in some parts of the state. This listing will help farmers identify hunters who are looking for a place to hunt, and is another tool farmers can use to deal with local wildlife crop damage."

"The listing service should help bring hunters and farmers together," said the DNR's Bishop. "Farmers who want to reduce the number of deer on their land need to attract more hunters and have those hunters shoot does. But hunters must understand that the farmers are under no obligation and these are not guaranteed places to hunt. For this program to succeed, the hunters must be courteous and follow the landowner's rules."

To ensure that both farmers and hunters are satisfied, both parties should clearly understand what is expected before permission to hunt is granted. Phone numbers for participating county farm bureaus are: Appanoose: 515-437-4333; Davis: 515-664-2238; Jefferson: 515-472-2128; Monroe: 515-932-7873; Van Buren: 319-293-3758; Wapello: 515-682-8714.

Winter Habitat, Food Plots for Pheasants

Food plots are not the total answer to increasing Iowa's pheasant population, but they are an excellent management tool and source of research information, according to DNR wildlife biologist Todd Bogenschutz.

"Habitat on private lands, whether food plots or some other practice, is the key to higher pheasant numbers," said Bogenschutz. "Because more than 95 percent of Iowa is in private ownership, it is important for landowners to understand the importance of safe winter cover near the food plots. Of course, nesting and brood-rearing cover are also important, and habitat doesn't have to be a food plot. A landowner can provide habitat simply by not mowing waterways or roadsides."

"Research has shown that wild hen pheasants, feeding in corn and sorghum food plots near dense winter cover, had higher fat reserves than hens not feeding in food plots," said Bogenschutz. "Higher fat reserves contribute to higher reproductive success, and hens in good physical condition can nest earlier. First nests usually have higher survival rates and larger clutch sizes."

"Food plots with dense cover also offer protection from predators," Bogenschutz continued. "Winter concentrates birds regardless of food. A bird that can travel ten yards to feed in a food plot has a lower predation risk than one that must travel a half-mile to feed in a plowed field. In addition, foraging efforts are reduced, leaving the birds with increased energy reserves. As snow depths increase, pheasants will leave good winter feeding areas with marginal cover for areas with poor feed but dense wetland cover. To minimize predation, food plots should not be established next to tall trees, old farmsteads, rock piles, or other similar areas."

Landowners interested in developing wildlife habitat can receive information and assistance by wanting: Habitat Improvement, DNR, Wallace State Office Bldg., 900 E. Grand, Des Moines, IA 50319-0034, or by calling 515-281-5918.

Trumpeter Swan or Snow Goose? Waterfowlers Beware

Trumpeter swan restoration programs are showing great signs of success and snow goose populations are at record high levels, but waterfowl hunters should have no difficulty seeing the difference between a swan and a snow goose, according to DNR wildlife biologist Guy Zenner.

"A mature trumpeter swan is a very large, all-white bird with no black on the wing tips, a long neck, and a unique call," Zenner said. "Juvenile swans are a darker, sooty-gray color, especially in the head and neck area. While a snow goose tips the scale at about six pounds and has a wingspan of about three feet, a trumpeter swan weighs 21-30 pounds and has a wing spread of seven to eight feet. Tundra swans, which look just like a smaller trumpeter with a yellow spot on the beak in front of the eye, also migrate through Iowa. A tundra swan is also considerably larger than a snow goose, weighing 13 to 18 pounds, and having a wingspread of six to seven feet."

"Although the major snow goose migration is near the Missouri River in western Iowa, some snows may show up in scattered areas around the state. I want to emphasize that so far there have been no problems with swans being mistaken for geese. However, I want to remind waterfowl hunters to be aware that swans may be seen in their hunting areas and they should know how to identify them."

MICHIGAN

WATERFOWL OPENER SLOW IN NORTH ZONE

Results of Department of Natural Resources hunter bag checks on Sat., Sept. 28, opening day of the 1996 waterfowl season in the Upper Peninsula, show hunter success was less than last year.

Jerry Martz, Wildlife Division Waterfowl Specialist, said opening day weather was ideal for hunters, but the numbers of ducks available for hunters was lower than last year at the seven major sites checked by DNR biologists. He suggested that local production was not as good as that in 1995 and that this year's flight of Canadian birds is just starting.

Mallards and wood ducks were the most common species in this year's bag check, but there was a scarcity of ring-necked ducks and green-winged teal. Canada geese made up a larger proportion of this year's bag. This was expected, as this year's goose opener and duck opener were the same date. In other years the goose opener was a week earlier than that for ducks.

ROSE LAKE SHOOTING RANGE TO BE REBUILT

The shooting range at the Rose Lake Wildlife Research Area on Peacock Road has been temporarily closed to allow for contractors to rebuild it into a modem shooting facility.

The $500,000 project will include 25, 50 and 100-yard ranges with covered shooting benches.

The facility will also include a shotgun range with ten shooting positions. Funding for these improvements for the area's shooting sports enthusiasts will come from state recreation finds and federal excise taxes on hunting and shooting sports equipment.

The contractor, R. P. Wood Construction, Inc., of Unionville, Michigan, has already begun earth work. The anticipated completion date is June 1, 1997.

While Department of Natural Resources officials regret the inconvenience this project may cause to those who have used the Rose Lake Range, they are confident that patrons will find the new facility worth the wait. Persons seeking alternate locations to practice their shooting sports are encouraged to investigate the several private-sector ranges and sportsmen's clubs in the area that provide public shooting hours. For information on local shooting facilities, call the Michigan United Conservation Clubs at 517-371-1041.

 

MINNESOTA

Geese Unlimited makes first-ever habitat donation to DNR

Geese Unlimited, a waterfowl conservation group based in Grand Rapids, recently refocused its efforts from goose relocation to goose habitat conservation with a first-ever donation of $15,000 to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.

The money was needed to pay for the planting of winter wheat on approximately 600 acres of a state waterfowl refuge field near the Roseau River Wildlife Management Area in northwestern Minnesota. Planted in late summer, the wheat provides food for migrating Canada geese in the fall and again in the spring, according to Randy Prachar, assistant wildlife area manager.

Though planted in a wildlife refuge, which is off-limits to hunting, the wheat benefits hunters by keeping geese in the general area for several weeks. The plantings also lure the hungry waterfowl away from private crop fields, much to the gratitude of local farmers.

The donation marks the first time that Geese Unlimited, a long-time partner with the DNR in goose relocation, has made a donation for goose habitat.

"GU has been a tremendous ally in establishing goose populations throughout Minnesota," said Tom Landwehr, DNR wetland wildlife program leader. Landwehr said that the organization has worked with wildlife managers to transfer excess geese captured in the Twin Cities metro region to other parts of the state. "The fruits of their work are evidenced by the statewide early goose season and in the numbers of geese found in parts of Minnesota where people never thought there would be geese," Landwehr said.

Because of Geese Unlimited's tremendous successes, the DNR asked the group to use its growing membership to help fund ongoing goose management needs, such as establishing winter wheat plantings on refuges.

Butch Bakken, Geese Unlimited executive director, said his organization sees the need for moving into habitat management. The Roseau River refuge donation was selected for the first donation, he said, because members can see a wide range of values. "This is a habitat project that benefits geese by providing them with food during their migration, while also benefiting hunters and farmers," he said. GU is looking for other projects on which to cooperate, he added.

DNR and Geese Unlimited relocate 3,600 goslings

Thanks to the efforts of Geese Unlimited and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, some 3,600 young Canada geese have new homes in rural Minnesota and two adjacent states.

The goslings were captured as part of the Twin Cities metropolitan goose management program in June and July. All 2,000 of the adults captured were processed as meat for area food shelves, because there were no suitable release sites. No other state would take them, and, if released in Minnesota, they would promptly return to the site from which they were removed. The goslings, however, will regard their new release site as home, because that's where they will learn to fly.

Geese Unlimited, a Grand Rapids based conservation organization, helped DNR relocate some 1,500 goslings to sites in northwestern Minnesota. These remote sites represent the few remaining locations where geese can be relocated in Minnesota without aggravating existing goose problems. Geese Unlimited volunteers have helped move some 35,000 goslings to northern Minnesota over the past 10 years. This has substantially helped establish and supplement goose populations in that part of the state.

Tom Landwehr, DNR Wetland Wildlife Program leader, said the efforts of Geese Unlimited and DNR, coupled with the goose's ability to coexist with humans, has produced a windfall for hunters.

"A major reason we've got an almost statewide early goose season this year is due to the volunteer efforts of Geese Unlimited," Landwehr said. "They've helped establish flocks in much of northern Minnesota, in areas where we'd never thought geese could survive. We're now facing the ironic situation of problems developing from too many geese in some northern Minnesota locations."

In addition to the Minnesota releases, South Dakota and Iowa also received goslings this year. Because the number of potential release sites in Minnesota is dwindling, the DNR hopes to continue sending goslings to Iowa and South Dakota in the future. "We also hope the early goose season helps slow the growth rate of the population," Landwehr said. "The goose population explosion is a tremendous success story, and provides hunters a whole new opportunity."

NEBRASKA

LATE SEASON GOOSE ZONE CHANGED, HUNTING OPPORTUNITY INCREASED

The late season light goose zone boundaries have been changed to allow additional hunting opportunity, thanks to action taken by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commissions at their meeting in Lincoln Oct. 17.

The change effects light goose hunting during the late season, in early 1997. The season in Zone 1 will be Feb. 1 - 16, 1997; and the season in Zone 2 will be Feb. 2 - March 10, 1997. The limits will be 10 light geese in the daily bag and 40 in possession.

The Commission had proposed a change in the Federal framework for snow goose hunting early in the year, but the final framework dates were not available at the time of the August Commission meeting when waterfowl hunting season dates were set. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has now agreed to allow Nebraska to modify the area that can be open until March 10, increasing hunting opportunity by increasing the area included in Zone 2.

Zone 1 will be bounded by and within the area described by a line at the intersection of the Platte River and U.S. Hwy. 92 in Polk County, east to Neb. Hwy. 15, south to Neb. Hwy. 4, west to U.S. Hwy 34, west to U.S. Hwy. 283, north to U.S. Hwy. 30, east to U.S. Hwy. 281, south to Neb. Hwy. 2, east to the intersection with the Platte River, and east along the Platte River to the beginning. Where the Platte River is the boundary between Zones 1 and 2, both banks of the river will be in Zone 1.

NORTH DAKOTA

OPENING WEEKEND GROUSE & HUN SUCCESS BETTER THIS YEAR THAN LAST

Sharp-tailed grouse and Hungarian partridge hunters appear to have had better hunting success on opening weekend this year than they did in 1995. The improved success occurred mainly in the area southwest of the Missouri River, according to Jerry Kobriger, small game supervisor for the North Dakota Game and Fish Department.

Opening weekend hunting survey cards received from 1,243 hunters bear out Kobriger's earlier predictions for improved hunting in the southwest and spotty success in the rest of the state.

The 1,243 hunters in the survey took 196 partridge opening weekend. The statewide harvest rate was .03 birds per hour. A closer look at the area southwest of the river, showed hunter success at .06 partridge per hour, double that of the rest of the state. During the 1995 opener hunters took .02 birds per hour statewide and .03 in the southwest.

Surveyed sharptail hunters took 2,464 birds or .40 birds per hour on a statewide basis during the 1996 opener. Southwest of the river the harvest rate was .47 birds per hour. During the 1995 opener hunters reported taking .32 sharptails per hour statewide and .40 birds in the southwest.

Sage grouse success also appeared to be up this year. Few adult males were taken and most birds were adult hens or young of the year, showing hunters were locating family groups. Although the sample of sage grouse is small, it points to good production this year, Kobriger said. Visit our Home Page at http://www.state.nd.us/gnf

G&F LOOKS AT SNOW GOOSE PROBLEM

Lots of snow geese should be good news to waterfowl managers and to hunters. But it's not. Actually there are too many snow geese - so many that they are seriously damaging their arctic nesting habitat, according to Mike Johnson, waterfowl biologist for the North Dakota Game and Fish Department.

The mid-continent snow goose population that migrates through the Central and Mississippi flyways is large and growing. Last December's index of nearly 3 million birds indicates that the population could be twice that number, several times more than arctic nesting grounds can support. The over-abundance of birds is resulting in extensive destruction of arctic habitats. Eventually snow goose populations will decline or possibly crash, regardless of what wildlife managers attempt.

"We are facing serious overabundance of a waterfowl species for the first time ever and we lack the history and experience to guide us in our management," Johnson said. "Nevertheless, we have two choices: do nothing and allow the continued habitat destruction and population impacts that would be irresponsible -- or try to control events as best we can. Our efforts may or may not succeed, but we at least have to give it a try."

Many solutions have been proposed, all of which require changes in state and federal laws or international treaties. Increasing the possession limit, for example, is among the easier tasks. North Dakota and other Central Flyway states, already have bumped the snow goose possession limit from 20 to 40 birds. "We know this will not significantly increase harvest but it will allow some hunters to take additional birds," Johnson said.

Removing restrictions on hunting methods, such as baiting, electronic calls, or live decoys are much more difficult because state and federal regulations must be amended. Such changes might be considered for the future.

Spring hunting or extended seasons would be the most difficult to implement because of restrictions in international migratory bird treaties. These treaties, dating back to 1916, limit waterfowl seasons to a maximum of 107 days between September 1 and March 10. Treaty amendments would require negotiations and approval of the United States and other countries. In any case, such changes probably could not be made for many years. "The last treaty change took more than 15 years to accomplish," Johnson adds.

For the near term the game and fish department is considering a number of suggestions for dealing with the problem. The most common ideas are:

· Open waterfowl rest areas and refuges to hunting. These closed areas help to keep geese in the state for a longer time, increasing the harvest. However, opening them to hunting could actually reduce total kill by driving birds from the state earlier in the season.

· Allow full day goose hunting. North Dakota currently restricts hunting to half days so geese can feed and rest. Changing shooting hours might be counterproductive in that it would push birds from the state earlier in the fall and reduce harvest.

· Encourage additional hunting by nonresidents. Current state law restricts them to 14 days of waterfowling. More hunters would increase the snow goose harvest. The game and fish department notes, however, that many of the state's residents are opposed to more nonresident hunters. This change would have to addressed by the legislature.

Initial solutions will stress hunting -- both sport and subsistence -- to help solve the problem.

"Regardless of what is done, it will include hunters. But, if it gets beyond what they can do, then solutions may require actual population control by government agencies," Johnson said. Although the approach North Dakota will take is not yet clear, the department is examining what it can do. Additionally, an international committee is reviewing problems and possible solutions and will make recommendations later this fall. "It is likely that any proposed management will be controversial and will require extensive work to gain public acceptance. However, we believe the problem is serious enough that it must be addressed."

SOUTH DAKOTA

RUMORS ARE UNTRUE

There are rumors going around that big numbers of giant Canada geese died during the trapping and relocation effort carried out in Lake County earlier this summer. However, Game, Fish and Parks officials say the survival rate of the geese was extraordinarily high.

"We got a fortunate break in our hot summer weather at just the right time," said George Vandel. "The mild temperatures and some special precautions we took allowed more than 98 percent of the captured geese to be released back into the wild," he said.

Right after being captured, the adult birds were separated from the young ones to prevent injury to the immature geese. During transportation, the geese were also sprayed with water to keep them cool.

Seven capture sites in Lake County resulted in 805 geese being moved. Only 11 birds died, either at the capture site or on the way to the release site. Those 11 represent just 1.4 percent of the total number of birds that were captured. Vandel said the department was very pleased with the high survival rate.

"Capturing and relocating any animal is a stressful experience," he said. "It's not something we do all that often, so we do everything possible to keep the animals calm and comfortable and get them transported quickly to the release sites. This particular effort went very well."

As part of the relocation process, all of the birds that were captured were banded. Eventually, hunters who return the information from those bands will provide additional information.

Many of the geese that were released have been observed by landowners with no reports of any dramatic losses at this time.

"All things considered, we are very happy with the relocation effort and the low mortality of the birds moved. Somehow, a rumor got started that a large number of the birds died, but that simply is not true," Vandel said.

NONRESIDENT LICENSE FEES TO CHANGE

The Game, Fish and Parks Commission has adopted a number of changes to nonresident hunting and fishing license fees that will go into effect in 1997.

Although most of the fees will increase from existing fees, a new price for Small Game licenses for nonresident youths is actually a reduction in cost. The $25 youth license is $40 less than it is under existing rules. Currently, young nonresident small game hunters must buy a regular small game license for $65.

Game, Fish and Parks Secretary John Cooper said, " We are currently reviewing the types of licenses and fee structure for resident hunters and anglers. The resident proposal will be made to the Game, Fish and Parks Commission sometime this winter."

The nonresident fees approved for 1997 are:

Small Game - $95 Youth Small Game - $25

Waterfowl - $100 Shooting Preserve - $30

1996 DUCKS UNLIMITED PROJECTS

This summer was busy one for Ducks Unlimited and Game, Fish and Parks in South Dakota, with more than 20 major public and private land projects completed in a number of counties across the state.

"Ducks Unlimited will complete wetland projects this year in South Dakota that restore, create, or enhance almost 1,000 acres of wetland habitat" according to Don McCrea, DU Project Coordinator for Game, Fish and Parks.

In addition, Ducks Unlimited will help Game, Fish and Parks acquire several tracts of wetland habitat to be used as state Game Production Areas. "These habitat acquisitions are extremely important to South Dakota waterfowl hunters. As opportunities for public hunting continue to be threatened, Ducks Unlimited and Game, Fish and Parks are joining together to provide secure public hunting areas for present and future generations of hunters and other wildlife enthusiasts. After acquiring these areas, the Game, Fish and Parks Department will continue paying property taxes on them as it does on all their Game Production Areas," McCrea said.

Ducks Unlimited will purchase a number of waterfowl nesting structures for placement on public land, and will also assist private landowners to set up managed grazing systems in areas containing good wetland complexes.

McCrea said, "With almost $700,000 committed this year for South Dakota projects, Ducks Unlimited continues to be our best partner and wetland ally in the effort to put more ducks in the sky. Whether you hunt ducks or not, being a member of Ducks Unlimited brings huge benefits in many ways for South Dakota citizens and wildlife. "

WISCONSIN

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT CHANGES TO WISCONSIN'S TRESPASS LAW

Question: Are the proposed trespass law changes now in effect?

Answer: Yes. Assembly Bill AB 13 was signed into law as Wisconsin Act 451 making changes in the trespass laws that hunters, trappers, anglers and other recreationists need to know.

Question: What is the basic concept of the trespass law?

Answer: It is trespass for a person to enter or remain on ANY LAND if the person receives notice from the owner or occupant not to enter or remain on the land. For certain types of land (fenced, cultivated, undeveloped or land that is occupied by an agricultural structure), notice is not required, and it is trespass for a person to enter or remain on the land without the express or implied consent of the owner or occupant.

Question: What is the most important change you need to be aware of?

Answer: Under the old law, people needed prior permission to enter any agricultural land, fenced land or posted land. Under the new law, people need prior permission to enter all private agricultural land, fenced land, and UNDEVELOPED land whether or not the land is posted. Basically, people need to have permission before entering any private lands. This includes forest lands, grasslands and wetlands as well as farmland.

Question: Are there any exceptions?

Answer: Yes. A person may go up to a private residence to talk with a landowner or occupant or to ask for permission to enter private lands. However, a person must leave such premises if requested to do so by the owner or occupant.

Question: What is the penalty for violating this law?

Answer: The penalty for violating the trespass statute is a civil (not criminal) forfeiture. The maximum penalty for violating the trespass statute is a forfeiture of $ 1000. A person who receives a trespass citation may choose not to contest the citation in which case the person forfeits the deposit, which is $203.

Question: Who enforces the trespass law?

Answer: Trespass laws are enforced by county or local law enforcement officers. DNR wardens are not authorized to enforce trespass laws.

Question: What if there are no fences or signs warning a people they are about to enter private lands?

Answer: Recreationists are responsible for knowing property boundaries and should obtain a plat book if they are unfamiliar with the land ownership where they recreate. Ignorance of property boundaries does not exempt a person from prosecution under the law.

Question: Wouldn't it be easy to cross over inadvertently from public lands to private lands?

Answer: Recreationists can look for tell-tale signs of private lands including buildings, cropland, pasture and fences. But, again, it's the responsibility of recreationists to know where they are. Under the revised trespass law, notice to prevent access is only required on private lands adjacent to public lands and private inholdings within public lands. This notice could include a minimum of two signs per 40 acres located in conspicuous places or personal oral or written contact by the occupant or owner. Owners of private lands adjacent to other private lands that are leased for public hunting or enrolled in forest laws requiring public access are not required to provide such notice-permission must be sought before entering these lands.

Question: Is it okay to take a short-cut back to a road across private land, chase dogs across private land, or follow wounded game onto private land without first getting permission?

Answer: No. This would be a violation of the law.

Question: Is written permission necessary?

Answer: No, but this is a good idea. A written note would clarify to any person or law enforcement officer permission was granted to be on the land.

Question: If someone obtains permission to do one activity on private lands, does that give that person permission to be on those lands for other activities as well?

Answer: No. A person may only enter private lands only for those activities for which permission was specifically granted. Any other activity would be considered trespass. For example, a hunter who receives permission to turkey hunt, cannot return later to pick morels or asparagus, or event to hunt small game or deer, unless the hunter also obtained permission for those specific activities.

 

SOUTHCENTRAL STATES

ARKANSAS

Comments sought on Lake Nimrod waterfowl project

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Little Rock District is seeking public comments on a proposed improvement to the greentree reservoir in the Lake Nimrod Waterfowl Area.

The waterfowl area is managed by the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission on Corps owned land under an agreement between the two agencies. It offers public duck hunting and enhances bottomland hardwood habitat for deer, squirrels, turkey and other animals.

The Corps of Engineers is seeking comment on two documents concerning the project - a Draft Environmental Assessment and a Funding of No Significant Impact. These indicate the project will cause no significant adverse effects to the environment, and no Environmental Impact Statement will be required.

The work includes building a control structure for the greentree reservoir to allow better water management. The man-made reservoir creates a shallow, wooded lake for waterfowl and must be drained annually to sustain the trees. Cost of the project is and estimated $38,000, with 75 percent to be paid by the Corps of Engineers and 25 percent by the Game and Fish Commission. Construction will begin in 1997 if the project is approved and funded.

KANSAS

POWER COMPANY OPENS WETLAND

The Kansas City area's first manmade wetland, located west of Gardner, KS., was officially opened in late September. More than a dozen local organizations worked together to convert the 50-acre tract owned by Kansas City Power and Light Company (KCPL) into wetland habitat.

This new wetland, named the KCPL Prairie Wetland, will serve primarily as wildlife habitat and as a community education resource. Highlighting the wetland's educational function, 80 students from six metropolitan area schools identified plants and studied water quality on the area during a Sept. 27 dedication. The site will also support research on the role of wetlands in improving water quality.

The wetland covers 24 acres of the area along a tributary of the Big Bull Creek, nine miles upstream from Hillsdale Reservoir. The wetland includes islands and walking trails, and a wildlife observation berm is planned. Upland areas surrounding the wetland will be seeded with native prairie plants and grasses for wildlife food and cover.

Dan Lekie, district wildlife biologist with the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, said that over the course of a year, he expects that more than 200 different species will be drawn to the wetland. A recent inventory of animal and plant life found raccoons, blue-winged teal and shoveler ducks, Canada geese, and killdeer on the area. Wetland plants included arrowhead, barnyard grass, and smartweed.

In addition to harboring a variety of wildlife, the wetland is a shallow basin divided into three pond-like cells that drain more than 400 acres of urban agricultural runoff. Seeded with grasses and other plants adapted to wetland soils, the cells collect and slow the flow of water though the area, absorbing flood waters and preventing soil erosion along the creek. Water entering the wetland takes two days to pass through. For more information on the project, call (816) 556-2926.

SPECIAL HUNTS AT SAND HILLS STATE PARK

In an effort to provide exceptional outdoor experiences, the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks will again offer a special hunting opportunity at Sand Hills State Park this fall. Upland birds and deer will be the primary quarry, but hunts will also involve rabbit and turkey.

Sand Hills State Park, a 1,123-acre natural area comprised of woodlands and prairie, is located northeast of Hutchinson. Hunting for upland birds and rabbits by permit only will be offered on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays throughout the upland bird season, which runs Nov. 9-Jan. 31. One permit will be issued for each day, and permit holders may take two friends.

In prior years, there were no special fees involved for these hunts, other hunting licenses and deer permits. This year, there will be a trail access permit required for each person using the part. The permits are $2.50 per day or $10.50 for the annual trail access permit. All permits are available at the Cheney State Park Office.

Permit applications may be obtained by contacting the Cheney State Park Office, (316) 542-3664.

Louisiana

TWO WILDLIFE AREAS PRESERVED FOR POSTERITY

Louisiana's first urban wildlife refuge now has permanent rules established for public recreation. The Wildlife and Fisheries Commission ratified regulations for visitors to the 237-acre Waddill Wildlife Refuge in Baton Rouge, as well as for a new wildlife management area in St. Charles Parish.

"The regulations will ensure continued enjoyment of these important areas for generations," said James Manning, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Fur and Refuge Division Administrator.

Waddill Refuge, adjacent to the Comite River, was donated to LDWF in 1941. It was used for many years by the Baton Rouge City Police for youth and other activities. LDWF is now taming the property into a recreation and education complex, complete with a nature center and nature trails.

The 3,921 acre Timken WMA is owned by the Orleans City Park Improvement Association and is being leased to LDWF. Close proximity to New Orleans, Lafitte and Des ARemands is sure to make it popular with hunters and wildlife watchers alike.

OKLAHOMA

Snow goose numbers nearing crisis levels

The Mid-continent snow goose population has literally exploded during the last decade, seriously degrading Arctic nesting habitat and leading biologists to worry about potential disease outbreaks and severe, long-term damage to the birds' breeding grounds. A variety of other migratory bird species also will be impacted if either of these potentially disastrous events occur.

"Snows nest in colony sites in Canada and because of their increased numbers, they are literally eating themselves out of house and home," said Mike O'Meilia, migratory bird biologist for the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation. "Hunters are a key component to helping alleviate this serious overpopulation problem, and we're doing everything we can to help get the message out to the public. We have liberalized the harvest regulations to the maximum allowed by international treaty to bring snow goose numbers into check with their Arctic breeding habitat."

O'Meilia said that in addition to a 107-day hunting season on light geese, the possession limit has been increased to 40. Biologists hope the season and bag limit structure will provide additional incentives to hunt snow geese.

Hunting for light geese (snows, blues and Ross') opened Nov. 23 and continues through March 9, 1997. The daily bag limit for light geese is 10, with a possession limit of 40.

Snow geese are most commonly found in the eastern portion of the state, with large numbers of the birds frequently seen feeding in crop fields adjacent to refuge areas. Most successful snow goose hunters set up large numbers of rag decoys in fields being frequented by the geese. Of course, securing permission to hunt snow geese on private land is a must.

"We'd certainly like to encourage farmers to allow hunters access to hunt snow geese," said O'Meilia. "Without access to feeding fields, we will never be able to harvest the number of birds that we need to."

Access fee created for Honobla Creek WMA

Beginning Jan.1, 1997, anyone wanting to use Honobia Creek Wildlife Management Area in southeast Oklahoma will need to purchase a $16 access permit.

In April, the Wildlife Department entered into a cooperative agreement with John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company to provide public access to John Hancock's 215,000 acres of timberland for hunting, fishing, camping and other forms of outdoor recreation. Those timberlands, located in Pushmataha and LeFlore counties, has been named Honobia Creek WMA. The Department will partner with Hancock to actively manage the fish and wildlife resources on this new management area.

"All of the funds raised by this access fee will be spent on developing and managing the wildlife resources and habitat on the area," said Richard Hatcher, game chief for the Wildlife Department. "Without the permit, we simply couldn't maintain the area, and we certainly couldn't pursue many habitat improvement projects. With funding from the access permit and through a working partnership with John Hancock, a great deal of habitat work can be accomplished.

"Basically, people are getting a 215,000-acre lease for $16. Part of the impetus for this agreement stemmed from the growing trend in the area to lease large tracts of timber land to private interests. We didn't want to see the public locked out of this beautiful area and thankfully, neither did John Hancock."

Hatcher said the area will be open for public recreation this fall but the access permit will not be required until Jan.1, 1997. At that time, anyone wanting to use Honobia Creek WMA, including hunters, anglers, campers and others, will be required to purchase an access permit. The only people not required to purchase the permit will be residents under 18 years of age or 64 years of age and older. Lifetime license holders will need to purchase the permit if they intend to use Honobia Creek.

Earlier this year the Oklahoma Legislature passed a law allowing the Wildlife Conservation Commission to establish a special use permit for people using private land in 4,000-acre blocks or larger which is leased and administered by the Wildlife Department. The Legislature set the maximum fee that could be charged at $25 and specified which state residents would be exempt from the permit.

At its July meeting, the Oklahoma Wildlife Conservation Commission, the Wildlife Department's governing body, voted to create the $16 access fee for Honobia Creek WMA.

"This endeavor with John Hancock is a significant step toward providing outdoor enthusiasts with additional high-quality public recreation areas," said Hatcher. "We're trying to meet tomorrow's demand for public-use land today, and in this case, we're able to do that through the financial support of those who will be enjoying that land."

Hatcher said that the Department will probably propose a very liberal use policy for Honobia Creek and that the Department's management proposal for the area will be taken to public hearings later this year. He also said that this access fee applies only to private lands managed by the Department for outdoor recreation and it does not have any bearing on existing wildlife management areas.

The Department is continuing to work with other timber companies with large landholdings to secure similar agreements to provide additional recreational opportunities for the public.

TEXAS

Public Dove Hunting In South Zone Off To Great Start

Early field reports indicate higher than average hunter success on Texas Parks and Wildlife Department public dove hunting leases in the South Zone.

Areas between Houston and Beaumont/Port Arthur, those sites around Corpus Christi and areas southeast of San Antonio have reported lots of hunting activity during the first week of the South Zone season, which opened Sept. 20 and rans through Nov. 7. "There's been lots of shooting on just about every area. On the Chaparral Wildlife Management Area, hunters were averaging 7.7 birds in the bag apiece and many hunters were limiting out at most of the dove lease areas," said Kirby Brown, TPWD public hunting program director. "That's above the statewide average and excellent for a public hunting area. There were lots of kids out with parents and grandparents having a ball."

The dove hunting areas will be open to any hunter with a valid Texas hunting license and a $40 annual public hunting permit, which also allows access to over a million acres of public land for many types of hunting and outdoor recreation opportunities, including deer, squirrel and waterfowl. Youth under 17 need the special resident license, but do not require the annual public hunting permit when hunting with a permitted adult.

Brown said few restrictions will be placed on users of the dove lease lands, however, with recent rains on many of the areas, hunters are reminded to stay on paved or topped access roads. "Remember, these are private lands and hunters should respect that by not getting off the blacktop or gravel roads and paying attention to all signs," said Brown.

Maps of the dove areas will be available only to permit holders and are distributed by mail with the map booklet within a week after you purchase the Annual Public Hunting Permit at any store that sells licenses. A copy of the map booklet and dove maps are also available at the time of purchase at TPWD offices that sell licenses. "Remember," Brown advised, "Our TPWD offices that sell permits and have map booklets on the spot are only open Monday through Friday from 8-5, so keep this in mind and plan ahead."

For more information about the program, call 1-800-792-1112 or 512389-4505. The Annual Public Hunting Permit is available now wherever licenses are sold and via credit card by calling 1-800-TX-LIC-4-U. When using the toll free number, the map book with the dove lease supplement will be mailed within two days of purchase.

TPWD PROVIDES VEGETATION MAP OF TEXAS ON INTERNET

Internet browsers can now get a visual perspective of the actual "lay of the land" in Texas with regards to the vegetation composition through a digitized version of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department's "The Vegetation Types of Texas" booklet.

The on-line publication can be found on TPWD's home page website: http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/admin/veg

"This is a very valuable resource because it depicts the vegetation dynamics of Texas as they existed during the late 1970s and early '80s," said Kirby Brown, one of the original publication's co-authors. "It will enable folks to see what types of plant communities existed 20 to 25 years ago in the various ecological regions of the state, particularly around metropolitan areas. And, although we don't have any plans to go back and re-map the state with current information, individuals could make their own comparisons."

The original information was gathered using LANDSAT MultiSpectral Scanner (MSS) imagery during the 1970s and early 1980s, combined with actual ground-truthing by field biologists to create a multi-colored illustration indexing vegetation types across the state. In addition to the map, which is currently out of print, information from the original booklet includes summary information and digitized color photographs about each of the 52 distinctive vegetation types found in Texas.

The distinctive vegetation types are described by Physiognomic Regions, such as Brush, Grassland, Shrubs, Woods, Forests, Marshes, Crops and Swamps.

"This program works with simple browsers up through the latest Netscape 3.x and Internet Explorer 3.x browsers," explained Scott Brown, the Internet program's author with TPWD. "We designed it to function with the simplest browsers, but those who have the latest browsers can take advantage of advanced Javascript features including a client side search engine that references species, counties and eco-regions."

"We wanted to make the information accessible for students, but we also had a lot of interest from university researchers who could benefit from this type of data," said Kim Ludeke, TPWD's GIS (Geographic Information Systems) lab manager. "We're also looking to introduce eco-region and subregional maps with cross-references to the vegetation map which will provide even more information about Texas resources."

Visitors to the site can download a full-sized digitized version (37" x 37") of the original color map in Adobe Illustrator (1MB compressed) format or in TIFF (340k compressed) format.

SOUTHEASTERN STATES

ALABAMA

THE HISTORY OF WINGSHOOTING

By Stanley D. Stewart

Wildlife Biologist

What is the attraction of a flying target for so many hunters and shooters? It's a pastime that becomes passion. The thrill of connecting with a flying bird, real or clay, brings a pleasure beyond explanation. The satisfaction is found in the difficulty of hitting a moving target.

A still target offers little attraction. This is why bird hunters avidly pursue ruffed grouse, but few go after blue grouse. The blue grouse has a habit of sitting in a tree and refusing to fly away from the potential death waiting below. This is disconcerting to the hunter, who stands underneath and throws sticks to make the bird fly. The grouse just dodges the sticks and hops to another limb. The hunter cannot fathom a game bird so stupid that it will not fly away from danger, so the blue grouse is called a "fool hen. "

This name comes from the perspective of the wingshooter, who walks away and leaves the bird because it won't present a flying target. Maybe the blue grouse is smarter than we think.

Did nimrods before the advent of modern shotguns have the passion for pursuing a flying target? If they did, they certainly had no way of fulfilling it. Game birds had to be captured by nets or falcons. The breeding of land spaniels to locate game birds to be taken by nets or falcons was well developed in Europe in the fourteenth century and long preceded wingshooting. I suppose enough bird hunters finally watched enough game birds fly away and concluded that what they really needed was a light game gun. Wingshooting was an emerging sport in France and England in the late 1600s.

Taking game birds in flight became possible after development of a relatively light gun fired by an improved flintlock with faster lock time. During the same period, shot makers discovered a method of making round lead shot by pouring molten lead through a sieve and allowing the drops to fall into water.

Early shotguns were single barrel muzzle loaders. Double barrel flintlocks were made in the late 1700s, followed by percussion fire hammer guns in the 1800s. Percussion shotguns greatly improved wingshooting success because of rapid ignition. During the last half of the nineteenth century, breech loading hammerless guns firing smokeless powder cartridges made shotgunning even easier. The period from about 1880 to 1920 is considered the golden age of shotgunning. During this era most refinements in shotgun design were made.

Fine firearms and specialized bird dogs made wingshooting very popular. But game birds couldn't provide all of the shotgunning opportunity desired. Shotgun sports designed to simulate wingshooting became popular in the late 1800s. Early targets were feather filled glass balls. Later, clay targets thrown, presented challenge in flying targets.

Clay target shooting is challenging, but hunters say it cannot match the anticipation of going after a real bird with unpredictable behavior. A clay target's flight path is pretty much fixed, but a bird's may change any second. The bird's ability to do this pleases the hunter in concept, but often perturbs him at the moment. This paradox of wingshooting is the very reason why many enjoy it and come back for more.

 

TENNESSEE

PUBLIC HUNTING LANDS AVAILABLE

Hunters looking for a place to hunt may wish to try some of the over 700,000 acres in the Public Hunting Areas (PHA) program. These lands are the result of a cooperative effort between the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and several landholding companies to provide public hunting.

Timber companies participating in the program are: Bowater Incorporated, Champion International, Tenneco, Westvaco Corporation, Willamette Industries, Inc., and Graham Public Hunting Area. A permit is required to hunt the areas and permits are available at locations throughout the state. Locations are listed in the back of the 1996-97 Tennessee Hunting and Trapping Guide, available where hunting and fishing licenses are sold.

Depending on the location, hunters can expect to find deer, waterfowl, squirrels, quail, and rabbits. Many areas have excellent deer hunting and areas with recent timber harvests have excellent small game hunting available.

For First Time, One-Day Youth Waterfowl hunt Established In Tennessee

Young sportsmen, 15 and under, with an interest in ducks and geese will be allowed a one-day hunt on Jan. 25, the first time Tennessee has ever established a youth waterfowl hunting day.

The hunt was created after the U. S. Fish & Waterfowl Service presented the idea to wildlife agencies across America in an attempt to gain more interest in waterfowl hunting and to give adults quality time with young outdoorsmen.

The hunt will be held after the regular waterfowl season ends. Hunters between 10 and 15 years of age must be accompanied by adults 18 or older, while youth under 10 must be accompanied by adults 21 or older.

Only the young sportsmen may hunt, and they will be allowed a bag limit identical to the regular duck and goose seasons. Those limits and other waterfowl regulations are listed in the 1996-97 waterfowl guide.

VIRGINIA

Virginia Bird Counts

Grouse: The "average" rate of harvest is seemingly a meager reward for the dedicated hours that grouse hunters spend afield. Hunters may be short of grouse in the mature forests of southwestern Virginia but they are long on persistence and stamina. Field reports by Department personnel indicate that fair numbers of small size broods are being observed during this years reproductive season. It appears that there will be a similar availability of birds this fall as experienced with the 1995-96 season but the scattered supply of food may help to concentrate birds and ease the need for enduring stamina. Late spring frosts in the area hurt grape production on many mountain ridges this year. So keep putting one foot in front of the other, shotgun to the ready, as you bulldoze through the cover with each step of anticipation.

Waterfowl: Anticipate good availability of mallards and wood ducks in the Clinch, New, Powell and forks of the Holston rivers this season. In 1995, few waterfowl hunters took advantage of the our first early Canada goose season. Locally reared, non-migratory Canada geese numbers continue to increase. With the population's nucleus located in Holston River drainage and flocks developing in Ciratson, Scott and Tazewell counties. The early opening/closing of the resident goose season "assure protection of the troubled migratory geese breeding in Canada, as they begin the first full moon in October to winter in Va. Many of the local flocks find sanctuary in waters closed to hunting in urban areas.

As an additional note, the Department began a population study of resident geese by tagging 485 birds th leg bands and neck collars in 1994. Hunters are urged to report their band recoveries from harvested birds either to the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Laurel, Maryland or the Virginia Department of Game and twand Fisheries at Marion.

NORTHEAST STATES

DELAWARE

STATE ADDS 900 ACRES TO WOODLAND BEACH WILDLIFE AREA

The Woodland Beach Wildlife Area has grown by more than 900 acres through the recent acquisition of the former McKay Farm.

The tract, located east of Smyma, contains 657 acres of tidal marsh, 139 acres of forested land and 113 acres of tillable agricultural lands. The lands are prime habitat for white-tailed deer, waterfowl and small game as well as several threatened plant species. The parcel also features 2,300 feet of shoreline frontage along the Smyma River.

The property also contains a 200-year-old structure which is listed on the National Historic Register. The building, which was operated as the Short's Landing Hotel during the 1800s, will be utilized as office space for staff with the Division of Fish and Wildlife.

The property was purchased from the Brandywine Construction Company of Wilmington for $989,000. Funds used for the purchase came from the Open Space Program.

Staff with the Division of Fish and Wildlife are in the process of marking property boundaries and undertaking other activities to prepare the property for use by the public. The tract began to be open for deer hunting beginning with the October 21 archery season. Upland game hunting will be allowed by permit only on Monday, Wednesday and Friday during November, December and January seasons.

The acquisition of the property creates a link between the Cedar Swamp and Woodland Beach Wildlife Areas. Combined, the two areas contain more than 9000 acres of land.

GROWING RESIDENT GOOSE POPULATION HAS STATE SEEKING INPUT ON SOLUTIONS

Resident Canada geese have been rapidly increasing in Delaware and other states since the mid-1980s and it is estimated by researchers that the population may double every 5-7 years. Currently there are 800 thousand to 1 million resident Canada geese in the Atlantic Flyway and approximately 5,000 in Delaware.

Resident Canada geese are not wild geese from Canada that have decided to stay in Delaware. They are birds which have been hatched and raised in Delaware," says Tom Whittendale, a biologist with the Division of Fish and Wildlife. "They do not migrate and will never go to Canada no matter what we do. Migration routes are taught to young geese by their parents their first year and birds that have been taught to migrate to Delaware or anywhere else will continue to do so throughout their lives. Birds migrate because they cannot survive the winter on the breeding grounds. Since the weather in Delaware is not severe enough to force birds south there is no need for residents to migrate and no migration routes have been established or taught to each new generation."

Our original resident geese probably came from birds released as ornamental geese on residential ponds in northern New Castle County, Delaware and south eastern Pennsylvania. Almost all of the problems in Delaware with resident geese, until very recently, have been in New Castle County, north of I95. Most of these problems have involved golf courses, parks, industrial complexes and hospitals. More recently geese have become a big problem in Kent and Sussex Counties.

The Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife has been catching and moving nuisance geese at the request of landowners since at least the early 1980s. Originally Delaware, like many other states with resident goose problems, captured the birds and transferred them to other states which wanted them. Delaware birds have been sent to Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, and West Virginia at one time or another. Usually this amounted to about 100-200 birds a year. Unfortunately, over time all the states that wanted geese have gotten them and are now experiencing their own problems. There is no state east of the Mississippi River that will take resident geese at this time.

In recent years, nuisance geese from New Castle County have been moved to state and federal refuges and wildlife areas. This was done in the hope that the birds would be more available to hunters. However, this has not proved to be the case. Resident birds usually move from the release sites to what they are familiar with ponds and lawns in residential areas and golf courses. In addition, because of the small size of the state many of the birds find their way back to the capture site.

Hunting the birds has not been a successful control method since most birds wind up in areas where they cannot be hunted. In 1995, the state held a special 15-day season with a bag limit of 5 birds per day statewide, but only about 280 birds were shot and more than half of these were taken on one farm.

At this point, the Division of Fish and Wildlife is faced with a dilemma as to what to do with resident geese. We can catch the birds but no other state is willing to take them and there is no place in Delaware where we can release them where they will not become an added problem, says Whittendale. Hunting is not an adequate method of controlling population growth because the birds concentrate in areas where they cannot be hunted. Habitat modification such as fencing and the use of bad tasting sprays may discourage birds at one location but will move them onto someone else's property. Egg shaking (with a permit) can be used to reduce or eliminate reproduction in some situations and euthanasia of some populations may be necessary. It will probably be necessary to use a combination of the techniques above and possibly others in order to find a solution to the problem.

New Jersey

1996 SPECIAL SEPTEMBER CANADA GOOSE SEASON PRELIMINARY HARVEST RESULTS

According to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection's Division of Fish, Game and Wildlife, an estimated 12,600 Canada geese were harvested during the 1996 September season held September 3-30. This total is approximately 16 percent of the state's estimated 80,000 resident geese.

According to division Director Bob McDowell, New Jersey hunters experienced one of the longest September Canada goose seasons in the United States. "As a result of long-term, intensive scientific research and population monitoring conducted and financed by the division, we have the necessary information to support a longer hunting season than most other states. Research indicates that few if any migrant Canada geese are present in New Jersey before September 30 and that these birds do not begin arriving until October. As a result, the September season should have a minimal impact on critically low populations of migrant geese while allowing increased recreational hunting opportunities on burgeoning populations of resident Canada geese. Although resident Canada geese are a tremendously valuable wildlife resource, their population growth has led to increased crop depredation and nuisance problems in many areas around the state. This season provides greater relief to farmers and other landowners experiencing such problems."

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), which is the agency with ultimate management authority for migratory gamebirds, suspended the traditional Canada goose season throughout the Atlantic Flyway in 1995 as well as this year in an effort to protect this troubled migrant goose population. Even though migrant goose populations increased in 1996 by 57 percent over 1995 levels, this population is still at critically low levels.

Though the migrant populations have declined, resident populations have increased dramatically from a statewide population of about 50,000 geese in 1990 to about 80,000 in 1996. "The September goose harvest will probably not reduce the overall resident goose population, however, it should help to substantially reduce the population's growth rate," said Paul Castelli, a wildlife biologist in charge of the division's Waterfowl Ecology and Management Project.

With the regular Canada goose season closed, harvesting expanding populations of resident Canada geese during September plays a major role in managing the population. Special September seasons from 1993 to 1995 ended on September 15 with harvests ranging from 5,000 to 7,800 geese. A total of 5,294 permits were issued for the 1996 September season compared to about 4,000 per year during the last three years.

"Extending the season to September 30 increased the harvest by 60 percent over 1995. Cooler weather and greater access to harvested agricultural fields this year led to a statewide harvest of approximately 600 geese per day after September 15, compared to only 435 geese per day prior to that date," said Ted Nichols, a wildlife biologist with the division's Waterfowl Ecology and Management Project.

Special winter Canada goose seasons help to curb resident goose populations as well. The division increased the 1997 Special Winter Canada Goose Season to 28 days, from 13 days during the previous two years. Season dates will be January 15 - February 15, 1997 in two areas of the state.

SPECIAL WINTER HUNT CANADA GOOSE SEASON JAN 15 - FEB 1, 1997

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection's Division of Fish, Game and Wildlife informs hunters that a Special Winter Canada Goose Season will be held from Wednesday, January 15 to Saturday, February 15, 1997 in two areas of the state.

"New Jersey is home to two populations of Canada geese; resident birds that live here year-round and migrants that breed in sub-arctic regions of Canada during summer and travel south to spend winter in lower latitude areas, including New Jersey," said division Director Bob McDowell. "While migrants have declined due to poor reproduction in the arctic and low survival rates, resident populations continue to grow, along with goose related property damage. The special winter season will help to curb this expanding resident population."

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), which is the agency with ultimate management authority for migratory gamebirds, suspended the traditional Canada goose season throughout the Atlantic Flyway in 1995 and 1996 in an effort to protect this troubled migrant goose population. On a positive note, these protective measures are working, as migrant populations experienced a 57-percent increase this year. Such efforts will have to remain in effect however, as migrant populations are still at critically low levels.

The USFWS has set criteria that individual states must meet in order to hold special winter seasons to target resident Canada geese. The two special winter hunt areas were chosen because they meet the criteria that no more than 20-percent of the wintering Canada goose population in an area be comprised of migrants. In the two selected areas, biologists estimate that 85-percent of the wintering geese are residents and that the harvest of migrant geese will be minimal.

Special winter seasons were first held in northern New Jersey in 1995 with a harvest of 840 geese. The season was expanded in 1996 to include a portion of southern New Jersey with a harvest of 2,731 geese. The winter season during both of these years was 13 days in length.

"During the 1997 winter season, a total of 28 hunting days will be available and we expect a harvest of about 4,000 to 5,000 geese," McDowell said.

Boundaries for the hunt area in the northern portion of the state will be the same as in 1996, while boundaries for the southern hunt area have been slightly modified.

"Unlike the Special September Canada Goose Season which was held statewide, the Special Winter Season has distinct boundaries. Sportsmen and women are reminded to check the hunt area boundaries carefully before hunting," advised Rob Winkel, chief of the division's Bureau of Law Enforcement.

Hunters must possess a Special Winter Canada Goose Season Pet while hunting during this season. The permit can be obtained by sending a 3" X 5" index card with the applicant's name, full mailing address, EVENING telephone number and date of birth to:

NJ Division of Fish, Game and Wildlife,CN 400,Trenton, NJ 08625-0400,Attention: Goose Permits.

Hunters not providing the required information may be denied permits. A processing fee of $2 must also accompany this information. Checks or money orders should be made payable to the NJ Division of Fish, Game and Wildlife. Applicants may not send cash.

NEW YORK

DRAFT LONG RANGE MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPLETED FOR PHEASANTS

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) today announced the completion of a draft long range plan for Ring-necked Pheasant Management in New York State. The draft plan is a culmination of three years work revising the State's pheasant plan adopted in 1979.

"Public participation has played an important role throughout the revision process," said Michael Murphy, pheasant plan coordinator for DEC. "This process was guided by a diverse group of people who have an interest in pheasants along with an evaluation of the 1979 plan, a review of current research and examination of other states' pheasant programs."

The purpose of the plan is to meet the current and future needs of people for pheasant hunting, observation and education opportunities within biological constraints and consistent with available funding.

Recommendations outlined in the draft plan include:

* delineate current pheasant range and amend hunting regulations accordingly

* provide input to federal agricultural policies and programs that may affect pheasants

* establish a working group of individuals interested in plants and animals dependent on grasslands for their existence

* provide $10,000 annually to purchase warm and cool season grass seed and shrubs for distribution to private landowners

* continue to provide day-old pheasant chicks and young pheasants for DEC's cooperative rearing and release programs

* continue to monitor statewide trends in pheasant populations and conduct surveys, as needed, to assess local populations in primary pheasant range

* survey pheasant hunters to determine their attitudes, activities and satisfactions

* develop two pheasant habitat improvement demonstration areas to encourage habitat projects on private lands

* continue to provide information and technical advice to members of the public wishing to improve their land for pheasants.

Among the groups that contributed to the development of the plan were sportsmen and women, birders, animal rights and welfare organizations, farmers, outdoor writers, cooperative extension agents and others. DEC hopes these interested individuals and others will provide comments on the draft plan.

A summary of the draft plan can be obtained by writing to Michael J. Murphy, NYSDEC, 81 Game Farm Road, Ithaca, NY, 14850.

The State pheasant rearing farms in Basom and Ithaca annually distribute about 60,000 chicks and 15,000 young pheasants to cooperators participating in the Day-Old Pheasant Chick Program and the Young Pheasant Release Program. These cooperators raise and/or release the birds they receive on land open to public hunting. The State also releases about 25,000 adult pheasants just prior to and during fall hunting season. Most of these releases occur on State wildlife management and cooperative hunting areas.

Pheasants were first released in New York more than l00 years ago. The first hunting season for pheasants began in 1908. In 1994, 50,874 pheasant hunters harvested 216,138 pheasants, according to DEC's annual small game telephone survey.

MOUNTAIN STATES

COLORADO

DECLINE IN HABITAT THREATENING SAGE GROUSE

Sagebrush has long been synonymous with the vast openness of the West. The definitive plant of high-country desert, its wind-swept husk setting the movie stage of many a Western drama.

For most people familiar with the West, it's difficult to picture sage as endangered habitat. But for one bird species perfectly evolved to use this environment, it's a vanishing resource.

Sage grouse, which use sagebrush both for food and shelter, are in rapid decline in Colorado. Once present in as many as 27 counties, they are now common in only about five to seven.

"It's a variety of habitat disruption that has caused the population decline: permanent removal, fragmentation and degradation," noted Clait Braun, a researcher with the Colorado Division of Wildlife. "All of these things are happening daily."

Counts in breeding areas this year were up as much as 10 percent, but researchers say that's probably just a blip in the large-scale declines many sage grouse populations are experiencing.

In lower Moffat County, Division researchers documented a 90 percent decline since 1978; at Cold Spring Mountain, the population has probably dropped 60 to 70 percent over the same time frame.

For sage grouse in the Gunnison area, which may be a species separate from the rest of Colorado, data indicate a 50 percent decline in overall population size since the late 1960s.

Perhaps more remarkable is that these birds use an environment that few competitors find enticing.

"From September to May, 95 percent of what they eat is sagebrush leaves," Braun said. "They are very specialized birds, evolved to use a poor-quality habitat."

Although these grouse subsist on sage for long periods of time, their eating, breeding and nesting habits are anything but simple. Sage grouse require large expanses of undisturbed sage country, from which they use different areas during different parts of the year.

For instance, during the winter when they feed heavily on sage above the snow, the birds prefer Wyoming big sage, and to a lesser extent, mountain big sage.

"They prefer certain subspecies of sage, and you have to think its because of the chemical composition -- sage contains some nasty chemical constituents," said Division Wildlife Researcher Tom Remington. "I think a lot of the habitats that produce the sage they prefer are also the best habitats for converting to agriculture."

During the spring breeding period the birds need small open areas, usually on a slight rise but near the protection of dense sage and woody vegetation, to use as leks. Many males will gather in these areas, puffing themselves up to display brilliant white chest feathers and two yellowish air sacs, from which they produce a popping sound to help attract females.

Females will nest within two miles of the leks during the early summer months, when they rely on both dense sage and summer grasses and forbs to hide them from predators. The nests also tend to be near riparian areas or wet meadows, and young grouse may feed heavily on insects from these areas as the forbs.

The bird's natural defense is cover from sage and grasses. Sage covers them from avian predators, and grasses from their ground predators. As such, the natural tendency for sage grouse is to walk, rather than fly.

"That's obviously a problem if you put a road through the middle of the habitat - these aren't the smartest birds around," Braun noted. But even less intrusive human disturbance can have disastrous effects for these birds. For instance, power lines increase the ability of raptors to spy and feed upon sage grouse.

Permanent removal of habitat often means turning sage country into agricultural fields. But residential development and fire suppression also have an effect by encouraging the growth of pinon-juniper trees in prime sage grouse country.

"If you look at all that country around Durango and Cortez, its now agricultural fields and invaded by pinon-juniper -- that all used to be prime sagebrush habitat," Braun said. "But it's really difficult to see the changes that have occurred because they transpired over decades and occurred before we were born."

Habitat fragmentation is believed to had a profound impact, although sage grouse populations have been found in habitat areas as small as 6,000 acres. Sage grouse are less susceptible to predation when they remain in good sage cover on the ground, but they still need to move to different areas several times a year.

Large-scale habitat degradation, much of it meant to increase livestock forage, has played a major role in dwindling populations. "There's been a war waged on sagebrush to get rid of it," Braun noted. "It really is becoming a critical habitat type."

For years, ranchers hoping to increase the carrying capacity of both public and private lands for livestock have used a variety of weapons battling the sage. Fields are disced, chained, burned and chemically treated to favor the production of grasses over sagebrush.

Although sage grouse also want grasses and forbs during the summer, the loss of their natural cover -- sagebrush -- is deadly. At the same time, heavy grazing of the grasses and forbs reduces the food supply for young birds and subjects the entire population to increased predation.

Heavy grazing on both private and public lands is believed to be a major contributor to disruption of the sage grouse habitat.

"Anything in moderation is going to help -- rotating fields for rest-rotation or taking only a certain percentage of the grasses and forbs available," Braun said. "There are grazing practices that are compatible -- we know the answers...

"But when you go in and eliminate huge chunks of sagebrush, there will be problems. They need sagebrush -- that's the bottom line."

MONTANA

Orange is the Answer

When thousands of upland bird hunters set, off for Montana's peaks and prairies this fall, I'll be among their ranks. But you'll never have trouble spotting me in the crowd. That's because on every outing since that fateful day when I was given a second shot at growing old, I've entered each birdy-looking piece of real estate I've encountered looking like a blazing orange neon light. A "hunter orange" cap and an equally bright sweatshirt are already stashed with the rest of my gear awaiting the year's first trip afield. Sure, that much of the stuff does make me stick out like a scarlet cardinal in the snow, but it certainly does the job. That job is allowing, indeed forcing, me to be seen. Consider these truths from the National Shooting Sports Foundation:

1. Fluorescent (blaze) orange is the most easily seen, recognized, bright, unnatural color against a natural background. It is the safest color for hunters to wear under all weather and light conditions.

2. Almost 10 percent of all hunters have color vision deficiencies. Red clothing is no longer recommended because red may not be seen by those hunters who cannot distinguish colors correctly, and because red is difficult to see in low light.

3. Accidents in which the victim was not seen by another hunter, in the path of his or her shotgun's swing or mistaken for game rank at the top of the list of the most common types of hunting accidents.

4. Hunter-orange clothing is a tremendous aid in helping hunters maintain visual contact with one another, particularly when moving through dense cover or woods.

Despite these facts, some hunters remain skeptical about the value of blaze orange clothing and traditionally resist wearing this lifesaving material while afield. The color, they say, may be seen by the game and lower their hunting success.

Fortunately, most states and Canadian provinces have stepped in and forced the issue upon -those skeptics by passing laws requiring certain hunters, particularly those pursuing big game, to wear hunter orange. And to quiet those doubting Thomases, studies show that hunter success has not declined in those states in which mandatory hunter orange regulations have been adopted, ours is one such state. Montana's current law dictates that all big game hunters (except bowhunters during special archery seasons) as well as those accompanying them must wear at least 400 square inches of hunter orange material above the waist and visible in all directions. A hat or cap alone, like a fluorescent orange band around a Stetson, will not suffice.

No, those of you with sharp eyes, the book says nothing about blaze orange for bird hunters. But I'm going to wear it. Lots of it, too. I wouldn't be caught dead without it. Well, er ... one frighteningly close call years ago has taught me I'm right.

WASHINGTON

Status of 13 wildlife species to be reviewed

The status of 13 wildlife species will be reviewed in coming months to determine if special protections are needed to ensure their survival in the state, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) announced today.

The studies will take place under an agency program aimed at identifying troubled, or potentially troubled, native wildlife species and mapping out strategies to restore them to health.

Under the program, the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission will ultimately decide which species should be put on the state's endangered, threatened or sensitive species list. Presently, 33 species are on the list.

"We'll be evaluating six species to determine if they should be downlisted or delisted, and seven others to see if they should be put on the list as endangered, threatened or sensitive," said Harriet Allen, who oversees the department's threatened and endangered species program.

The species that will be evaluated for possible downlisting or delisting, because of recovery successes, include the bald eagle, peregrine falcon, Columbian white-tailed deer, gray whale, Aleutian Canada goose and brown pelican.

The species being considered for listing include the sage grouse, sharp-tailed grouse, common loon, fisher, Oregon spotted frog, common murre and Olive Ridley sea turtle.

The Department of Fish and Wildlife defines an endangered species as one that is seriously threatened with extinction throughout all or a portion of its range. A threatened species is defined as one likely to become endangered unless steps are taken to reverse its decline.

A sensitive species is defined as one that is especially vulnerable or is declining, and is in need of special management consideration.

WDFW's listing procedures were adopted in 1990 by the state Fish and Wildlife Commission, the nine-member citizen's panel that establishes agency policy. The procedures were developed by citizens, constituent groups and state and federal natural resource agency officials.

Once listed as endangered or threatened, a recovery plan is written for the species. The plan outlines the steps needed to restore the species to healthy levels and prioritizes department activities.

For example, WDFW habitat acquisition funds are frequently allocated based on listed species. Agency personnel also provide landowners, city and county officials and others with in-depth information on listed species, where they are located and what steps are needed to protect and enhance their populations.

Allen said WDFW's efforts should not be confused with the federal government's program to list species as endangered or threatened based on the species' status throughout its entire range in the United States. The state's list serves as a wildlife management tool which identifies species in need of immediate attention within the state.

Species placed on the federal government's list receive protection under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). A species listed by the state does not receive protection under the ESA unless it also is on the federal government's list.

Allen said the department is seeking biological information on the status of the species to assist in the reviews. Biologists' draft status reviews and recommendations on at least eight of the species are expected to be available for public review by next spring. The department will then hold public meetings to discuss and explain the recommendations, and listen to citizen comments and suggestions.

The Fish and Wildlife Commission could render decisions on some species by August 1997. The commission is expected to decide the status of all 13 species by 1998.

U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

Partners for Wildlife Program Continues Conservation Success Story Through Voluntary Restoration of Wildlife Habitats for Private Landowners

Since 1987, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has successfully restored habitats on private lands through the Partners for Wildlife (PFW) program. During that time, 310,000 acres of wetlands, 135,000 acres of associated grasslands, 600 miles of riparian habitat have been restored throughout the nation.

The restoration of these important fish and wildlife habitats has been carried out in cooperation with private landowners, who have volunteered the use of their properties for conservation purposes. Most PFW projects have been completed without cost to more than 13,800 landowners, who have signed cooperative agreements to leave their restored habitats undisturbed for at least 10 years.

Typically, the Service furnishes technical assistance to landowners and pays for costs associated with restoration projects. Sometimes the Service provides funds and equipment to its partners, including state fish and wildlife agencies, soil and water conservation districts, private organizations, individuals and local agencies. Private partners often provide matching funds to the Service to cost-share the restoration of significant habitats.

"The success of the Partners for Wildlife program is reflected in the number of participating landowners and the interest of our partners to provide assistance," said Bill Hartwig, Director of the Service's Great Lakes-Big Rivers Region. "Frankly, I can't think of anyone who doesn't appreciate improved quality in their drinking water, or in the rivers and lakes where they do their recreational swimming, fishing and boating. Improving local water quality is an important aspect of this program to landowners and the general public. "

Other conservation benefits associated with PFW include:

* Enhanced habitats for wildlife

* Reduced downstream flooding by holding back the runoff of excess water

* Decreased soil erosion by stabilizing sediment-producing areas

* Additional recreational opportunities

* New economic opportunities for landowners and local communities

Through Partners for Wildlife outreach, the Region has assumed a leadership role within the Service for the restoration of important habitats, including converted wetlands and/or degraded tracts of native grasslands and bottomlands, for migratory birds, endangered species and anadromous fish."

During 1995 through the Partners for Wildlife program, 1,345 wetlands amounting to 6,023 acres and 1,189 acres of upland habitat, primarily grassland, were restored in the states of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio and Wisconsin.

In this Region from 1987-95, the PFW program has restored almost 15,700 wetland basins amounting to more than 62,200 acres. All the basins were restored in cooperation with more than 2,700 landowners. Funds and in-kind services have been provided by approximately 1,000 partners. For more information on the Partners for Wildlife program, contact the nearest Service field office or Steve Kufrin, Regional Private Funds Coordinator, at 612-725-3570.

DUCKS UNLIMITED

Ducks Unlimited Supporters Raise One Billionth Dollar

Ducks Unlimited today celebrated the one billionth dollar its supporters have raised since the founding of the world's largest private nonprofit wetlands, waterfowl, and wildlife conservation organization in 1937.

On the road to conserving nearly 7.5 million acres of wetland and waterfowl habitat across North America, Ducks Unlimited has grown supporters to more than 900,000 supporters. Today, Ducks Unlimited projects exist in all 50 states and in major regions of Canada and Mexico.

"The dedication and partnership of our volunteers, staff, and public and private supporters have played a major role in the dramatic resurgence of North America's waterfowl population over the past three years," said Matthew B. Connolly, Jr., executive vice president of Ducks Unlimited. "When water is plentiful, our habitat conservation programs promote population growth. In dry periods, our programs soften the impact of poor climatic and habitat conditions."

"Nearly 80 percent of every dollar raised by Ducks Unlimited is translated quickly and efficiently into habitat conservation," said Gene M. Henry, president of Ducks Unlimited.

"The greatest monument we can bequeath to tomorrow's the natural resource we protect today," said Henry. "That's why we are planning to launch a major new fund-raising campaign next May. For every acre we've conserved to-date, there's at least one more that needs to be enhanced, restored, or protected."

Ducks Unlimited (DU) was established by a handful of sportsmen alarmed by a plummeting waterfowl population caused by the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. From the start, DU focused on projects in Canada, where nearly 75 percent of North America's waterfowl are produced. Today, a majority of DU's habitat conservation work continues on upland nesting sites and shallow wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of the U. S. and Canada.

Ducks Unlimited waterfowl habitat projects benefit more than 600 species of wildlife, including many that are threatened or endangered.

Highlights

1937 Ducks Unlimited is incorporated in the U.S. to raise funds for conservation programs on Canada's Wetland and waterfowl breeding grounds

1938 Ducks Unlimited Canada Ltd. established to provide biological and engineering expertise in Canada

1960 DU conserves 1 millionth acre in Canada

1966 DU celebrates first $1 million fund-raising year

1970 DU membership reaches 50,000

1974 Ducks Unlimited de Mexico established to conserve habitat for wintering ducks

1979 DU volunteers raise 100 millionth dollar

1984 DU begins conservation programs in U.S. focused on habitat for breeding, nesting, migratory, and wintering waterfowl

1996 DU celebrates first $50+ million fund-raising year

1996 DU membership reaches 580,000; raises record-setting $77.6 million

Acreage conserved in Canada 4,975,534

Acreage conserved in Mexico 1,487,912

Acreage conserved in U.S. 913,000

Ruffed Grouse Society

RGS Celebrates 35 Years

The Ruffed Grouse Society was born during a business conference in a small Virginia town.

On a fall day of 1961 in Monterey, Va., Seybert Beverage (attorney) met with Britce R. Richardson, Jr, and Dixie L. Shiimate, Jr., in his office. After business was taken care of, talk turned to the upcoming hunting season and ruffed grouse.

They discussed a need to determine a way to help this superb game bird, for there were signs of increasing trouble. Generally, much wildlife habitat was disappearing annually as civilization demanded more room. And much of the forest habitat left was apparently far from ideal grouse cover, if declining numbers were any indication.

Their concern was re-enforced by the situation close to home. Around Monterey, hunters were finding fewer and fewer birds in the covers, with the suspicion growing that the decline had nothing to do with cyclical highs and lows.

Prior to their meeting, Mr. Richardson had already queried the Department of Interior and discovered that no organization was specifically helping the ruffed grouse. So, the three men launched the then Ruffed Grouse Society of America - now known as the Ruffed Grouse Society with its affiliated Ruffed Grouse Society of Canada.

The three became the organization first officers when, on Oct. 24, 1961, the Society received its charter of incorporation from Virginia.

Mr. Richardson was the first president, serving until 1966, while Mr. Beverage was secretary and editor of the Society small newsletter and Mr. Shumate took on the duties of treasurer.

Through the newsletter, they were quick to dispel any notions that they were expert grouse biologists.

For knowledge of grouse, he asked for help from other hunters, or anyone who had any special knowledge of the Ruffed Grouse. Grouse enthusiasts provided funds to study and help the bird. Because grouse had already demonstrated themselves poor subjects to be released in the wilds from captive rearing, they assumed assistance should focus on improving the birds' wild environment.

From the beginning, the three saw something more than the conservation of a native American game bird in their efforts. As Mr. Beverage observed in his editorial of the first newsletter: "Your editor feels that as long as the ruffed grouse survives, then America will survive.

They might have seemed an improbable trio to be forming an organization dedicated to the ruffed grouse. Mr. Beverage was confined to a wheelchair, the result of polio during childhood Mr. Shumate was a fish biologist, working with Mr. Richardson on a trout-rearing project.

Mr. Richardson gave over the duties of president to Keith Davis in August of 1966 and so the organization entered another phase of its growing process.

"It was my idea at first," Mr. Richardson acknowledged during an interview in 1984. "But it really got rolling after I found out from the Department of Interior there was no organized effort on behalf of the ruffed grouse. For all of us, it was a labor of love -- and from the first, we got the cooperation of a lot of fine people. "

Before his death 10 years after that observation, Mr. Richardson stated that he was pleased with what the Society had accomplished. He was also surprised at how large it had grown.

Mr. Richardson and his fellow organizers thought the membership "would include writers, scientists, game management experts and all persons from ruffed grouse states and elsewhere who are interested in the purposes of the Society. " They simply underestimated just how many sportsmen and women, as well as other concerned individuals, would actually want to be involved with the struggles of ruffed grouse.

"When we got involved in the Society, " he explained, "we weren't interested in promoting grouse shooting. Even back then, we were concerned with discovering what we could about improving habitat.

"It's funny," he continued, "that anything like this ever got started here. But we just went with an idea and got a pretty good response."

A response that grows stronger every year. A response that gave the Society the impetus to begin forest wildlife habitat improvement research. (That research would ultimately benefit many wildlife species, even if at first it was conducted on behalf of ruffed grouse and American' woodcock.)

In 1972, the Ruffed Grouse Society provided a grant to Gordon Gullion -- who would, over the years, earn the title "Mr. Grouse." His studies of grouse, grouse habitat and, most especially, the relationship between grouse and aspen are still paying dividends.

Although Gordon died in 1991 with work still under way, his completed research and similar efforts of others have provided much evidence to support sound science that forest management benefits both the woodlands and the wildlife that depend on them.

RGS has provided well over $1 million to sponsor habitat improvement research projects throughout the United States since 1972. Until 1978, all RGS support for research came directly, from membership dues. But the Ruffed Grouse Society was undergoing some dramatic changes in the late '70s.

It was then that the Society rededicated itself, shortened its name to the current style; hired a new executive director, a wildlife biologist named Samuel R. Pursglove, Jr.; and made new and aggressive plans for fund-raising.

The Society inaugurated its Sportsmen's Banquet Program in l978. That first year five dinners raised $46, 000. During that same year, RGS started to search out those willing to make a commitment beyond regular membership dues. The organization started signing up sponsor members for contributions of $200 or more.

The late '70s were certainly days of new beginnings. And those beginnings have expanded dramatically. Still, the Society continues to evolve, as the world in which it must operate, evolves.

The Ruffed Grouse Society

451 McCormick Rd.

Coraopolis, PA 15108

412-262-4044

1-888-JOIN-RGS (564-6747)

 Advertising Rates 

 Art

   Airedales

 American Water Spaniels

 Birds

 Books

 Dog Boxes & Trailers

Boykins

 Braques

Brittanys 

 Chesapeake Bay Retrievers

Collars

Clothes

Clumber Spaniels 

Cocker Spaniels

Curly Coat Retrievers

  Drahthaars

English Setters

English Springer Spaniels

 French Brittanys

Field Spaniels

Flat Coat Retrievers

German Long Hair Pointers

German Shorthaired Pointers

German Wirehaired Pointers

 Golden Retrievers

Gordon Setters 

 Guns & Gunsmithing 

Hunts & Training Areas 

Irish/Red Setters  

Irish Water Spaniels 

  Labrador Retrievers

Llewellin Setters

Large Munsterlanders 

Miscellaneous 

Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retrievers

 Pointers

Pointing Labs

Publications 

Pudelpointers

 Small Munsterlanders

Spaniels

 Spinone

Supplies

 Training

Video

Vizslas

  Weimaraners

 Welsh Springer Spaniels

Wirehaired Pointing Griffons 

Subscribe to BD&RN

 See all of our advertisers

GO TO OUR HOME PAGE

   Send us a message


Advertise with us for only $5 per month, you will get your own 20 word ad on your own page we will set up on our site (example), a link to your own page (if you have one) and the same ad will run in the print version of Bird Dog & Retriever News. Larger ads are also available. For $200 a year we offer a full web page (example). Just email us your ad and a billing address, we'll do the rest. Come visit our mall below

Copyrights Bird Dog & Retriever News March 1998
Do not reproduce or retransmit in any form
Maintained by Dennis Guldan publisher@Bird-Dog-News.Com
Bird Dog & Retriever News, 563 17th Ave NW, New Brighton, MN 55112,
Ph/Fx 612-636-8045